Growing up in a digital age, the days of traveling by paper
map seem far in the past. I still remember being a part of the experience—looking
over my dad’s shoulder on road trips as he painstakingly marked exits and
destinations with a pencil, helping read the map for him while he navigated
unknown roads. But still, paper maps had their limits. They couldn’t mark
detours, road changes, accidents, or disasters.
It’s a marvel how much cartography has evolved into the
sophisticated, comprehensive digital maps of today. Far beyond merely giving me
easy access to GPS capabilities or warning me about traffic, digital mapping
can provide information on little-known places and, when disaster strikes, digital
mapping can save lives.
In earthquake-prone areas, computer scientists have
collaborated with humanitarian aid workers and locals to construct a
comprehensive digital map during times of relative peace; when disaster hits, the
map alters. Collapsed buildings and blocked roads are taken into account, and
places where humans are trapped, or in need of rescue or supplies are marked on
the updated map. This method was used by Kathmandu Living Labs, founded by
Nepalese-American computer scientist Dr. Nama Budhathoki, after their 7.8
magnitude earthquake of April 2015. However, this concept of “crisis mapping” goes
back even further, back when Patrick Meier, in the wake of the 2010 catastrophic
Haiti earthquake, decided to compile everything from the internet—tweets,
Facebook posts, images—to construct a “disaster map” of the area. Crowdsourcing
the information allowed locals to inform Meier and his team of the areas in
most critical need of rescue or supplies, which then helped enormously in
directing humanitarian aid efforts. Meier marked big red dots on the digital
map to indicate pharmacies that were still operating, or that needed help. After
the Haiti earthquake, Meier has tried to bring digital mapping a step further,
and his next project is using drone technology to put together an even more
seamless and comprehensive 3-D model of areas prone to disaster.
To me, this seems like an example of a way in which social
media and digital technology has enormously benefited communities, especially
in times of disaster. Digital technology opens up channels of connectivity and
allows for quick, adaptive humanitarian responses that would not have been able
to be accomplished if maps were still confined to paper. Still, digital mapping
overall is a relatively new technology, and its wide-reaching capabilities can
potentially cause privacy infringements. But is that a small risk that is
outweighed by the life-saving power of maps? Or should that be a bigger
concern?
No comments:
Post a Comment